Feds Turn Down Fund Request for BQE Redesign and Reconstruction

Accoring to amNewYork Metro the Federal Highway Administration has rejected the City Department of Transportation’s request for funds to redesign and rebuild the “central section” of the Brooklyn Queens Expressway, the 1.5 mile section between Atlantic Avenue and Sands Street that includes the cantilevered stretch below Brooklyn Heights. In December 2022 the DOT revealed three possible plans for a rebuild of the cantilevered section. None drew enthusiastic community response. Later a controversy arose over whether the rebuilt central section would have its original six lanes (three in each direction) or four, to which it had been reduceed while emergency repairs are done. (The feds’ denial of funding does not affect funds for the emergency repairs being done now.)

As the amNewYork story notes, there was substantial community opposition to any plan to rebuild the central section of the BQE in its present location. It quotes Brooklyn Heights Association Executive Director Lara Birnback as calling it “basically a highway expansion project.” She also said she believes “wide community opposition” could have been a reason for the project’s not being granted the requested funding. The story also quotes Mona Bruno of the DOT, who noted it was “common to have to apply for grants multiple times, particularly for a huge project like the BQE.” Ms. Bruno also said the rejection “would not impact the project timeline, which sees construction starting in late 2027 and completion optimistically projected for 2032.”

Share this Story:

, , ,

  • clarknt67

    At least this may kick the can down the road until the city gets a mayor with some vision and imagination. (I can dream, can’t I?)

  • Effective Presenter

    And a brain.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7nPOzGeyaw Arch Stanton

    This isn’t going to end well… But the neighborhood is partly to blame. Years ago he city had a plan that was ready to go, it may not have been perfect but it would have fixed the highway, added needed ramps to the Brooklyn bridge and given us a wider Promenade. But the NIMBYists won and now here we are, at square zero. Had they lost, the construction would be probably nearing completion by now.

  • petercow

    Agreed 100%.

  • Cranberry Beret

    “a plan that was ready to go” – not true, it was a preliminary design

    “added needed ramps to the Brooklyn bridge” – not true, DOT later admitted this wasn’t feasible

    “the construction would be probably nearing completion by now” – not true, the city didn’t have the funding just like they don’t have funding now

    It’s a nice sound-bite to blame NIMBYs but the plan would’ve failed on its own regardless of public opinion.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7nPOzGeyaw Arch Stanton

    Ha, sounds like you have phantasmagoric memory.
    The plan was well developed, the city and state were in favor of it. If not for the incompetence of de Blasahole, caving into the NIMBYists, The plan would have very likely gone forward.
    Instead we got pie in the sky, dreams of a highway hidden by lush greenery on a terraced park… Almost a decade wasted on nonsense. Where are we now…
    And WTF would be wrong with a wider promenade?

  • Nomcebo Manzini

    Sorry, I think it’s you who needs to see a memory specialist. The bureaucrats & others at the DOT still revere Moses. They judge every proposal with ZERO concern as to consequences to mere citizens. So long as cars and trucks can get from here to there faster, they start very much in favor of this or that proposal.

    The posters around our still lovely neighborhood were not some bit of “wokery.” The proposal to turn the promenade into a 6-lane highway would have made for a good April Fool’s joke, but it was “on the table” for a month or 2 before sanity prevailed.

    I share your disdain for the former Mayor, but this couldn’t be simpler. The City does Firefighting excellently. Sanitation competently. Policing – I’m not at all sure.

    But DESIGN – ALL of the talent (even B and C level talent) in that field works in the private sector. The alternatives 2 of their number came up with were rejected by the City for no reason other than NIH – Not Invented Here (by the hacks working at the DOT.)

    Your “it would have been done by now” proves that you haven’t a clue.

  • https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7nPOzGeyaw Arch Stanton

    FYI, just about everything that sustains your (Questionably necessary) life is delivered by truck.
    I never said “it would have been done by now” I said nearing completion, meaning anywhere more than halfway, which it would be if not for the NIMBY.