Open Thread Wednesday

What’s on your mind? Comment away!

Share this Story:

  • Concerned

    Yes. I saw your response. Of course it’s not about basketball. It’s about hoods who are attracted to the courts (whether they play there or not). How else can you explain the problem at Pier 2 versus every other pier?
    And please don’t give me long term solutions right now. This is about a major problem happening right now that needs to be dealt with right now.,

  • Concerned

    And I know the vast majority of those at Pier 2 are NOT hoods.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    Pier 2 is sheltered–the only real shelter in the park right now. Within the park it’s centrally located. It’s huge. It has water and toilet facilities. I would guess that these characteristics, not the basketball courts (there are only, what, five full courts?) are what draw large crowds of people not necessarily there to make use of the facilities.

    You want short term, smaller picture solutions? The kind of police response we saw tonight is as short term, small picture as you can get.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    So punish the hoods!

  • Concerned

    You know what, SB? I think you really believe what you’re saying and I have to say, I think it’s commendable. But, i also think it’s really wrong. I mean, “water and toilet facilities”!?! Not to make fun, but have you ever played basketball at a public park or competitive street ball anywhere? Let me tell you what’s going on: disadvantaged youth are attracted to the b-ball court, most just to play, but a few to cause trouble. When things get hot on the court (a hard foul or someone is disrespected), the troublemakers take over.
    And in regards to your “punish the hoods” reply, that is reactionary and not proactive.
    There are plenty of basketball courts all around downtown Brooklyn and other areas. Why do we need so many at the BBP?

  • StudioBrooklyn

    My point was that collective punishment isn’t a viable solution. Assuming the police aren’t just behaving like a caricature of themselves, their continued presence is the only short term solution that doesn’t perpetually affect peaceful park-goers.

  • Concerned

    Wrong. And please don’t come after the police on this one. The last two times they had to do something at pier two, there was a shooting and planned brawls where people were knocked senseless.
    And what is the “collective punishment”? Taking away a few basketball courts??? There are basketball courts all over the city. Including some very nearby in downtown Brooklyn. Do you think that any player is going to miss a single game of basketball if we change the layout of pier 2? C’mon, SB. What about people being afraid to go to the park because they’re afraid pier 2 is going to get shut down again, or a shooting, or planned brawls??? How about OUR collective punishment?

  • StudioBrooklyn

    Wait why do you get to declare that I’m wrong? That’s not how this works.

    You have no idea whether removing a few basketball courts (and replacing them with what, hopscotch?) will affect the quality of that area’s foot traffic. Destroying the whole pier would be a safer bet.

  • Concerned

    Now you’re giving slippery slope arguments (destroy the pier), which is fine by me because I know you’re intelligent and have to see it. Moreover, we both know there are MANY other activities that can replace the courts (and what’s wrong with hopscotch?).
    At the very least, you are correct that I’m not sure if my solutions will work. I’m not sure, but the problem with the courts is staring us right in the face and something needs to be done about it.
    In regards to me calling you “wrong”, I’m pretty sure I did prove your assertion wrong, unless you can explain to me how ANYONE is going to miss a game of basketball in NYC if the courts are lessened. But that’s neither here nor there. I’m not trying to “prove you wrong” and I apologize for the curtness of the whole thing.
    Look, aren’t you afraid that your family would have been taking a walk around the pier 2 when the brawls or the shooting happened? I am. And I know a lot of other people are, too. Why can’t you accept that some poor youth who have been screwed by the system are now products of that system and cause problems at the basketball courts? Why is that such a hard concept? It’s not a racist concept. It’s a factual concept that is a damn shame. But why should the entire park and Brooklyn heights have to suffer because of it.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    The problem I have with your suggestion, removing the basketball courts, it sounds like a weak minded solution that has ulterior motives. As you say “I know the vast majority of those at Pier 2 are NOT hoods” So why should we deprive the majority or peaceful users recreation space, just because of a few troublemakers? Maybe because you don’t want ANY of “those people” coming through “our beautiful neighborhood”?

  • Concerned

    You call me weak minded and then imply I’m racist. You’re a real jerk, Arch.
    Do you have a solution, Arch?
    There are so many different people of color that use the park without issue. I have no problem with them. I am for equality. I am not for crime or good people being scared to use the park. Are you? Or are you just going to take pot shots at people from the sideline?
    And once again, we’re not depriving anyone of recreation space, or even basketball. We’d just be limiting the courts to two courts and using the other space for something else.
    How is this a bad idea?
    Or else we simply get a lot more police down there and on Joralemon. Either way, something must be done.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    My “destroy the pier” argument was deliberately made to represent the logical conclusion of the slippery slope on which your “get rid of the courts” argument is the first misstep, as Arch pointed out (in nowhere near as hostile a tone as you seem to have interpreted, IMO).

    If you ONLY want to go after the people who are more likely to commit crimes, as I see it you have two options (and now I will repeat myself for the last time): you can nip it in the bud by looking at the bigger picture and doing something about the root causes of criminal mischief, or you can put a bandaid on the symptoms by installing a large looming police presence (which is expensive and at best only forces the crime to go elsewhere). If you get rid of the courts, I believe Pier 2 will still attract crime-prone youths for the reasons I mentioned earlier, and if not, perhaps Adam Yauch Park will become a very dangerous corner of the neighborhood.

    Am I scared to go into the park? No. My family and I are fairly street smart, but the reason we avoid the park at its busier times is because it’s crowded, loud, and annoying (same for Joralemon). I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more crime per capita in other parts of the city we’d normally consider “safe” to visit.

    But listen, Concerned, we can’t keep having this same argument over and over again. It accomplishes nothing and frankly it’s probably not good for our marriage. We both want the same thing—a cleaner, safer, happier park and neighborhood—and I hope it eventually happens somehow.

  • Concerned

    Please remember, I didn’t say that we should get rid of the courts, only that we should limit the BBP to two b-ball courts.
    Also, I didn’t take your slippery slope argument as hostile. But it’s like many other slippery slope arguments, when people say they’re “taking it to a logical conclusion”, they’re doing the exact opposite. It’s like me saying “I need gas for my car,” and then someone coming in to argue and say “well if you really need gas for your car, you shouldn’t just fill up the tank, you need to keep filling up a bunch of extra tanks and put them on the roof and in the passenger seats until you never run out of gas again.” That’s NOT a logical conclusion; it’s ridiculous and unhealthy for civil discourse.
    And in regards to our “marriage”, I think we’re in pretty good shape. You finally came around to see we need more police (even if it is a band-aid, which I always agreed with) and I’m happy that you’re keeping the kids safe on their scooters as well as not stalking KR at the pierrepont park, anymore.
    Thanks for the civil discourse. Be well.

  • HereToStay

    Stereotyping?? Please. Stop buying into the liberal media and the morons that write the 6pm local news and columns in The Daily News. Just stop.

  • HereToStay

    It is about rival gangs and beefs. They play there because there are a lot of courts and it is an amazing place to hang out.

  • CHatter

    Not just a Ch 11 case, but also a “prepack”, meaning that they filed the cases already having struck a deal with a sufficient number of the voting creditor classes to confirm a plan to reduce their borrowed-money indebtedness to (one hopes) sustainable levels. I haven’t read the plan, but the company announced that there would be no store closings. (I found that odd–this is a classic case of private equity exuberance for a debt-financed overexpansion, so I would have assumed that at least some of the further-flung stores would go.)
    Anyhow, I hope they are successful. I love that store.

  • ColumbiaHeightster

    Yes, that’s what it was. Saw on a run down at Pier 2 around 6am. St. Francis graduation.

  • ColumbiaHeightster

    People were knocked senseless? I think that it was reported that the pier was evacuated because of “planned” brawls. If you saw reporting that the brawls actually happened, could you share please? I’m not saying you’re wrong, but really would like to see the evidence of violence if you have it please. Thanks.

  • Concerned

    See Michelle’s comment from the last blog post about the pier being evacuated. Scary stuff.


    ” Avatar
    Michelle
    14 days ago
    On Monday evening, my friend and I witnessed a young man being jumped and beaten senseless by a group of kids near the picnic area by the Joralemon street entrance. We (and many others) called 911. After the police arrived and we continued on our way we noticed the basketball pier was closed. We asked a BBP employee why and they said it had gotten too crowded and fights were breaking out. So instead of monitoring the crowds as they left the pier, they just moved the crowds to other areas of the park, where the fights continued and a young man was terribly beaten. The park really needs to reconsider security.”

  • ColumbiaHeightster

    Ah ha. Yes, I recall reading this. Thanks.

  • gc

    At least we’re not in Dicken’s England where asking for some more might get you hanged. Maybe if the CEO’s compensation was a bit less than the $18,000,000 reported you might have a better case.

  • rubenkincaid

    Yes, it was around 5am. “check-check, 1-2-3″. Way too early. The Star Spangle Banner run-through mid-morning was nicely done.

  • Remsen Street Dweller
  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    I call it as I read it. If that’s not your true feelings you should be more carful how you write…
    Yes I do have a solution, as I said last week; Have all users sign in and show id. When the courts are busy, have a time limit and wait list.
    Thats a much better solution than downsizing the facilities. Which by the way, would only make matters worse, as the trying to get a place on the courts would become much more competitive.
    Also it provides less opportunity for the majority of peaceful players.

  • Concerned

    Well, you read it like a jerk. And, ironically (but par for the course on this blog), you told me to be careful how I write, but you spelled careful like this: “carful”. You actually have to defy the autocorrect to do such a thing, unless you’re on a 1980’s atari typewriter… You can’t make this stuff up.
    Either way, after you called me weak-minded and implied I’m a racist, i’m willing to put that aside, because let’s face it, i could be Donald Trump, or a dog, or Shania Twain… So, I actually like your ID requirement. However, the man power to a) check ID’s, b) give a time limit, and c) enforce all of the above, sounds somewhat expensive.
    As I’ve said before, there are tons of b-ball courts around NYC, there’s no reason for more than two at BBP. Nevertheless, there has to be MORE police presence at the BBP and on Joralemon, NOW!

  • StudioBrooklyn

    “Basketball courts = criminals” is an example of stereotyping. I’m not sure what media you think I’m consuming but you should know my conclusions are drawn from direct observation and the comments on this blog.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    Ok I’m not gonna go in-depth with this stuff, as I said, agree to disagree, and I think we’re on the same page, big picture.

    But I’m racking my brain: who is KR?!

  • Greg

    I’m not sure what I personally think of the whole situation, or what the best options ultimately are.

    But I want to share that I read your and StudioBrooklyn’s back-and-forth carefully and with an open mind.

    I was starting to get turned off by the increasingly mudslinging tone and the obvious sensitivity I saw seeping in that wasn’t, in my view, contributing well to the basic arguments.

    I was then pleasantly surprised to watch the debate pick up in civility and respect, and especially watch it acknowledge the well-meaning sincerity of all sides, even if opinions differ.

    That made me far more open to both viewpoints while independently solidifying my own feelings.

    Thank you for taking it there, and helping realize the community value this blog is capable of at best.

  • Teresa

    I was walking through the park at 7 am when the music was blasting and the security for the event said that the police had been there and that the event had a permit to make that amount of noise at that hour, and that it was necessary as a sound-check. The latter claim seemed dubious, given the length, volume, and frequency of the music.

  • Teresa

    Arguably, reducing the number of courts would increase the amount of tension because of reduced availability. Often the case with resources of any kind.