DUMBO Leader Tweaks Raw Nerve in Brooklyn Heights Library Re-development Dispute

In Thursday’s Brooklyn Daily Eagle, community advocate Doreen Gallo tweaked the raw nerve that is the proposed sale of the Brooklyn Heights and Pacific branches of the Brooklyn Public Library. The BPL’s controversial plan to sell the two properties—eliminating costly repairs and maintenance in exchange for new much reduced libraries rebuilt by developers—has been roundly criticized by many in the Brooklyn Heights community, including Citizens Defending Libraries, an advocacy group spearheaded by Michael D.D. White, a long-time Brooklyn Heights’ resident, and his wife, Carolyn McIntyre.

In an open letter to Brooklyn Borough President Eric Adams, published on the Eagle’s website, Ms. Gallo—executive director of the DUMBO Neighborhood Alliance who also sits on the Brooklyn Public Library Community Advisory Council—urged the newly-elected Beep to block consideration of the recent proposals to remake the Brooklyn Heights branch’s triangular lot at the intersction of Clinton and Cadman Plaza West into a high-rise residential tower housing a much smaller library.

Ms. Gallo also requested that Mr. Adams consider supporting a proposal to landmark all 21 of our borough’s Carnegie grant libraries, including the Pacific branch, which was the first of the Carnegie libraries constructed in Brooklyn.

Asked about his position on this thorny issue, Mr. Adams responded with an invitation to an upcoming reporters’ roundtable, where the Brooklyn Heights Blog will be represented and raise this and other local issues.

Perhaps most pertinent to any discussion about local libraries is the fiscal health of the parent organization, the Brooklyn Public Library. As a result of drastic cuts in City funding, the BPL has struggled in recent years to maintain reasonable levels of service. In an exclusive article dated February 28 of this year the Eagle reported that the BPL, now in the midst of its annual $500,000 spring appeal, “has amassed almost $300 millions worth of deferred repairs.” In the same article, the Eagle said that New York City Comptroller Scott Stringer will conduct a top-to-bottom audit of the non-profit organization, addressing a “broad range of fiscal issues.”

In publishing her anti-development viewpoint, Ms. Gallo is taking on the Brooklyn Heights Association (BHA), the venerable civic association that conditionally supports the BPL’s plan to eliminate a branch whose maintenance costs, according to BPL, have skyrocketed in recent years. According to a January 2013 statement on the BHA’s website, the Association gave its approval of a new, state-of-the-art branch in exchange for the proposed sale on the conditions that the BPL must maintain continuous library service to the community during demolition and construction, the replacement branch is of adequate size, and proceeds from the sale of the property go to the Brooklyn Public Library rather than to city coffers.

In putting herself on the same side as Mr. White, who on his website describes himself as an “attorney, urban planner and former government public finance and development official,” Ms. Gallo is tapping into a powerful strain of grass-roots advocacy that has created strong feelings on both sides of the debate. Mr. White and Ms McIntyre, along with others, expressed loud displeasure during last month’s annual BHA meeting at BHA President Alexandra Bowie’s discussion of the organization’s stance in the dispute.

Share this Story:

, , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

  • marshasrimler

    the business library belongs in downtown where it has been since inception.. that is the business center.. the park slope site is less accessible for the handicapped and the BPL has no plan as to how to finance the business libray move. the project calls for decreasing the size of the library by at least 1/3rd maybe more and part of it will be underground, those are facts

  • marshasrimler

    yes.. name calling is sad and not very heights like.. Beth. you are wrong on this one. This project will not happen and we will save
    our libraries another way’ Unless you behave and do not call names I will not respond to you again

  • Michael D. D. White

    SHRINK! SHRINk!! SHRInk!!! SHRink!!!! SHrink!!!!! Shrink!!!!!! shrink!!!!!!! shrnk!!!!!!!!

    Let’s not neglect noticing the fact that the proposal here is to drastically SHRink the Brooklyn Heights Library and exile, for all intents and purposes, probably pretty much get rid of, its Business and Career component, eliminate books and librarians and strip this Downtown centrally located library of its stature as a significant, regional, destination library that attracts and serves users from all over the city and borough.

    The self-cannibalizing selling off of libraries, ostensibly to fund a shrinking, less resourced library system, can only lead to an inevitable spiral of further decline throughout the BPL system as underfunding of the libraries is allowed to be used as an excuse to reward developers with more handouts like the sale of Manhattan’s 53rd Street Donnell Library site for an execrable pittance.

    Ms. Gallo is right on target when she points out that the: “Brooklyn Public Library Community Advisory Council (CAC), [on which she serves] . .was formed after the decision to sell off our libraries to developers was decided by a select few.” That’s something the Brooklyn Heights Association, also on the CAC, should similarly be pointing out to the community, not pretending to “negotiate” for the community when it is absolutely not doing so.

  • Michael D. D. White

    Correction: In 1986 they gave Ratner about half of the development rights to the site (without bid) and Ratner still has some of those rights unused to transfer back. Further, Ratner is the gatekeeper to the privately-owned St. Ann’s development rights. There is a lot of private profit to be made on this deal. On the public side, tearing down, rebuilding to get to a lesser shrunken, more underground and bookless library there will be a lot of cost and disruption. NOPE the public won’t own anything like the library it owned before. Re Ratner’s development rights see: Forest City Ratner As The Development Gatekeeper (And Profit taker) Getting The Benefit As Brooklyn Heights Public Library Is Sold

    http://noticingnewyork.blogspot.com/2013/09/forest-city-ratner-as-development.html

  • Michael D. D. White

    Yes, it is documented. When Eric Adams ran for office her said he opposed the sell-off of our libraries.

  • Michael D. D. White

    SHRINK! SHRINk!! SHRInk!!! SHRink!!!! SHrink!!!!! Shrink!!!!!! shrink!!!!!!! shrnk!!!!!!!!

    Let’s not neglect noticing the fact that the proposal here is to drastically SHRink the Brooklyn Heights Library and exile, for all intents and purposes, probably pretty much get rid of, its Business and Career component, eliminate books and librarians and strip this Downtown centrally located library of its stature as a significant, regional, destination library that attracts and serves users from all over the city and borough.

    The self-cannibalizing selling off of libraries, ostensibly to fund a shrinking, less resourced library system, can only lead to an inevitable spiral of further decline throughout the BPL system as underfunding of the libraries is allowed to be used as an excuse to reward developers with more handouts like the sale of Manhattan’s 53rd Street Donnell Library site for an execrable pittance.

    There is absolutely no way to assure that any money would go to other libraries in the shunken system as a result of this or any of the other sales or “leveraging” of all BPL property called for by the BPL strategic plan

  • Michael D. D. White

    “Moving” the Business and Career Library to the Grand Army Plaza branch where they are NOT building any additional space for it? Isn’t it entirely too credulous (at least you use the verb “believe”) to by into the notion that it won’t simply disappear the way books, librarians and services have been disappearing in the midst of these asset grabs? If you want a clue to the priorities here look at the debacle of the Donnell Library sale, sold off suddenly, secretively, and for a pittance.

  • brklynmind

    Lets assume that “stacks”of physical books can be of any help to “those needing retraining and jobs”, which is specious at best in a world where job searches are conducted online and youtube and Khan Academy is the place to go to for free training/courses on all subjects. Shouldnt the protest then be for a bigger library and/or more computer terminals at this location (and not for the restriction on property use) – both of which likely can be accommodated and financed by the very lucrative use of air rights in $$$$ Brooklyn Heights?

    So far no one has made a case that selling off the unutilized air rights for potentially tens of millions of dollars is somehow bad for the library or the library system (as opposed to being bad for peoples views or opinion on development)

  • brklynmind

    So then demand that pols direct all funds to the library system – instead of insisting that no funds be raised at all.

  • Michael D. D. White

    Let’s say I respond to you as if you are actually a truly existing member of the community expressing what you really think (an unusual one at that, in my experience, if you are- BTW: you are invited to contact Citizens Defending Libraries for a discussion if you would like to prove who you are). . .

    . . If I presume you to be in earnest, not someone on salary to promote a real estate development script, I would respond to you this way: Your Walt Whitman library is very much similarly at risk from the BPL’s strategic plan that literally proposes to “leverage” ALL of its real estate assets.

    You and your children, family and neighbors are affected by:

    * the sudden, secretive sale of the 53rd Street Donnell Library, for a pittance, a regional library that was largely and recently renovated.

    * the sudden, secretive sale of the publicly paid-for 34th Street Science, Industry and Business Library completed with great fanfare in 1996. (Might anyone form your family have hoped to use it going to CUNY?)

    * the sale and closing for drastic shrinkage of the Mid-Manhattan library.

    * the destruction and effective decommissioning of the 42nd Street Central Reference Library, destroying stacks that hold 3 million research books, which involves diverting $350++ million (perhaps a half billion of library funds- at least $150 million in new taxpayer dollars) into shrinking and selling libraries rather than spending it on branches including those in Brooklyn like Walt Whitman.

    * And remember that the Brooklyn Heights Library is a regional library used by people of every ilk coming from all over Brooklyn. Developers for the site are now being enticed with tales about how it is the most accessible site in Brooklyn- So it should transferred from the public to be owned to a specially privileged few? Please!

  • Michael D. D. White

    Here is an invitation to come out of the shadows.

    Since we, Citizens Deafening Libraries, are out in the community all the time we, like Ms. Gallo, know that the community overwhelmingly opposes the sale and shrinkage of the Brooklyn Heights Library (and other city libraries as well) and all the phony excuses being trumped up to support the idea. It is therefore interesting to muse about who among those commenting below offering pseudonymous community member-sounding names are actually expecting some sort of paycheck for pumping out hackneyed developer script points. Those who oppose shrinking libraries and all the disruption that entails, plus the machinations of underfunding the libraries beforehand are to be credibly attacked as NIMBYs? Really?

    How very clever!

    Mr. “WK Montague” must hope that no one has actually seen or used the Brooklyn Heights library when, he suggests he personally knows it to be: “completely obsolete” and “a dark and quite frankly unwelcoming place.” It’s got windows everywhere, on all sides and tons of light. Shrinking and moving its space underground in very tall tower casting more shadows into the Heights will somehow be the superior way to bring in light and make it a welcoming place? Libraries as creatures of obsolescence, particularly one of the most recently built?

    Besides do we need, thrown into this mix, a developer-style lecture about whether landmarking and respect for history has made Brooklyn Heights a more or less desirable neighborhood with more valuable real estate?

    We invite the pseudonymous commenters arguing for the sell-off of public assets with handouts that benefit developers, not the development community, (remember Donnell!) to come out of the shadows and contact Citizens Defending Libraries. Would you come to one of our forums? We note that those of us defending the libraries are mostly using our real names and have made it clear who we are.

  • bethman14

    HUH?!? When have they said anything about eliminating books and librarians? You’re making this stuff up as you go along! Its too bad that you CDL folks can’t be bothered with facts, or simply don’t have a solid enough argument to make without resorting to name calling and lying.

  • bethman14

    So anyone who disagrees with you, by your rather delusional, paranoid definition, must be in the pocket of a developer?
    Fascinating. You are so ideoligically commited, so utterly fanatical, that you can’t even concieve of the idea that reasonable neighbors of yours would disagree with you. What a sad, totalitarian world view you have Mike.
    It would be great to have an honest, well informed debate about this project, free of your name calling, hysteria and misrepresenation of the truth.
    Its clear to me that CDL has a strong, anti-development platform and that your opposition to this project is motivated by a Tea Party like visceral hatred for our former Mayor and the real estate development community.
    Its sad that you have given up any opportunity to leverage your clear intelligence and organizational skills into a position to make positive changes to this project for the community’s benefit.
    Throughout history, my friend, the fanatics usually don’t triumph. At least not for long. It would be great to have a constructive dialogue, but you don’t seem interested in that in the least. Too bad.

  • bethman14

    We should not believe what the Brooklyn Public Library, a respected instiution that has been around for over a century, tells us, and instead believe everythiny you say Mike? Because you have some special authority on the subject? You like to make a lot of claims. Where’s your evidence? I don’t get it. I really don’t. Paranoia is a sad thing, it truly is.

  • Jazz

    Shrink. Yes you need one. Maybe the dude who owns that haunted house on Columbia Heights is available to help.

  • marshasrimler

    so beth.. who are you really.. if your believe in what you say.. and are not
    a proxy for BPL or the developers who are you