The NY Times Sheds Light on the Opposition to Affordable Housing in Brooklyn Bridge Park

The New York Times has posted an in-depth look at the recent opposition to housing – notably the “affordable” kind – at Brooklyn Bridge Park’s Pier 6. After the city added an affordable housing component to the park’s long standing housing plan, a neighborhood group including long time Willowtown resident Joe Merz and lead by newcomer Lori Schomp mobilized this year to at least slow down the process. They succeeded in getting a TRO against the current plan moving forward.

The Times piece sheds some light on who Ms. Schomp and her position:

Lori Schomp, 33, the lead plaintiff in the Brooklyn Bridge Park case, moved into the neighborhood in 2013 with her boyfriend, Martin Hale. Mr. Hale purchased a $7.6 million townhouse on Willow Place through a limited liability company, records show; he is the chairman of People for Green Space.

The home that Hale/Schomp purchased was designed by Joe and Mary Merz fifty years ago. Mr. Merz is the co-plaintiff in the suit against the park.

The Times piece continues:

They make an odd couple of litigants — Ms. Schomp, who wants her view of the water on her frequent runs preserved, and Mr. Merz, who lectures softly on social theory, insisting on separating parkland from development.

“There will be those maybe pointing at us, saying, ‘Aha, you don’t want low-income housing,’ ” Mr. Merz said from his sunken living room overlooking a Zen garden.

He and his late wife developed senior housing in Buffalo, he said, and served as conservationists for Prospect Park.

“That’s an old game because you know very well we do prefer low-income housing,” Mr. Merz continued. “But we don’t want it in the wrong place, meaning there’s a right way to build it.”

Ms. Schomp added: “It has a higher calling as a park than as a place for a few people to live.”

Nina Lorenz Collins has lived in Brooklyn Heights longer than Ms. Schomp and presents a different view of the argument:

“It felt very Nimby, like ‘We don’t want poor people in the backyard,’ ” she said recently.

“After two months of those comments, I sent out an email to everyone. I said, ‘You are making me ashamed to be your neighbor, please stop.’ ”

In a BHB poll posted when the TRO was issued, 83% of respondents sided with Ms. Schomp’s position.

For some reason, this lyric from Pulp’s classic 90s nugget keeps repeating in our head as this battle rages on:

Laugh along with the common people
Laugh along although they’re laughing at you
and the stupid things that you do
because you think that poor is cool
Like a dog lying in a corner
they will bite you and never warn you
Look out
they’ll tear your insides out
‘cos everybody hates a tourist
especially one who thinks
it’s all such a laugh

Share this Story:

,

  • Joe A

    Sadly Judi you are wrong. Don’t you like the park Judi? Did you prefer rusty piers and rotting warehouses? Would you prefer that Judi? Don’t you think the children of Brooklyn deserve this beautiful park that we now have instead of some old crumbling warehouses. Come on Judi what is wrong with you?

  • Andrew Porter

    By this logic, no one should have filed those lawsuits seeking to stop Atlantic Yards. Yet as we’ve since seen, the claims of so much office and apartment development were all smoke and mirrors for the arena development.

  • Andrew Porter

    Actually, they were not “rusty piers and rotting warehouses”. They were maintained very well, and in fact Strober Bros. Lumber was there for many years, and other warehouses were used by the PA for their various promotions, and as warehouses, as witness the truck traffic into them.

  • Andrew Porter

    Actually, as shown by the many twists and turns with the LICH developments, despite all the good intentions of politicians, neighborhood associations, concerned citizens, etc., SUNY did exactly what they wanted to do. Faced with that fact, I’m not holding my breath that Good will triumph in this situation.

  • NeighboorHood

    And another thing (LOL!)… look at the very wording this the blog used for their headline! It’s deliberately aiding the pro-development powers that be in mislabeling the grass roots opposition in a negative and false light. “Shed some light on” as if those of us who have been against building (condo’s hotels etc) in the park are some secret group hiding our identities. I didn’t know Lori Schomp until I met her at a meeting of the Park Board where like minded neighbors met to oppose the building. She never has hidden her name as far as I can tell from the Save Pier 6 Group. Her photo and name were posted there in an article about her. Also this blog titles this story “Opposition to affordable housing” Say WHAT?! I had no idea we were all against affordable housing. Thanks BHB for enlightening me as to my position. So then according to this blog, if the red herring of a few affordable units were removed we would abandon our opposition to high rise buildings in the park right? Wrong! Can the blog at least report the fact that there is a large number of neighbors who oppose BUILDING more housing in the limited overcrowded park space without mislabeling that opposition as “against affordable hosing”? You didn’t get 83% of your readers responding that they were against affordable housing in the park!

  • Simon

    Doth protest too much. 83% of the people who voted in that poll sided with the carpet bagging Schomp not necessarily 83% of the readers here. Much less 83% of Brooklyn Heights. The opposition is made up of a rich newcomer preying on a beloved widower and the usual gang of suspects from across Atlantic Avenue still upset over the Promenade vs the Ditch.

  • BrooklynBugle

    One thing we have learned is that this topic has inspired the most uncivil discourse we’ve seen in a long time here. Mostly from one side.

  • BrooklynBugle

    We did cover a similar issue on Cobble Hill Blog a while back: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tdHhsIGo3lA&list=PLldjqFyEedIe5rT1P-6nDeGyaaahLuxw5&index=16

  • NeighboorHood

    Agreed BrooklynBugle! Would love some examples of “uncivil discourse”. Oh here’s some… asking if the husband of one of the notable opposition is a murderer? Or perhaps labeling those opposed to high rise multi-million dollar real estate developments in our park as “opposed to affordable housing”
    Those are just 2 off the top of my head. Feel ree to list more!!

  • NeighboorHood

    Huh? Other than the fact that this guy is one handsome bastard, what does this have to do with the other? More cheeky non-response responses from the Blog…sigh. It’s like having a debate with a 14 year old on The Facepage. Next up… “I know you are but what am I”

  • Miracis

    Agreed. And this tower is out of the way. I can’t imagine a plot of land squeezed between a beverage distribution plant and the BQE is really affecting anyone. This is a non issue. I don’t typically support these massive condo projects on principle, but why oppose this versus anything else?

  • skunky

    Shameful. Nice choice of a fake first name, too, “Taisha”.

  • 99 %

    Firstly, anyone who bought those ugly condo’s at 1bbp is a fool. You live on the BQE. Not a single retail space has opened in your amazing building, despite an amazing park, so you might want to question your judgement. Many of these bacame unsellable and were converted to rentals. As for Lori Shlomp (more like Shlump based on the photo), you clearly picked your boyfriend for his good looks and spiritely age, and some times when you dig for gold you end up digging up sh!t. I hope the entire population of East New York become your neighbors, and you have to wear a burka to leave that ugly box you live in.

  • Bill

    Is that really even a question?

  • badamant

    No it is not possible. If we had “pure unadulterated free market libertarianism” we WOULD HAVE NO PARKS (accept for the extremely rich).

  • Livingston

    Actually, badamant, that’s not correct. Central Park, a true jewel, is a public-private effort, with 85% of the funds (and management) coming from private donations (read: the rich). When the city ran it, it was allowed to become a crime-infested, deteriorating eye sore.

    As for the so-called affordable housing, not sure how that will contribute to the BBP coffers. I can see how it will suck up resources, and require more tax payer-funded subsidization, but that’s it. Which is a key reason why I don’t support it.

    BTW, most of my friends who have so-called affordable housing in places like Stuytown and Peter Cooper are professionals who have very good incomes. The rent breaks they receive have funded their weekend homes (Hamptons, Bucks County, Hudson Valley, Palm Beach) and/or multiple annual expensive vacations. Like everything in NYC, you put a system in place and everyone games it. Which is why I’m an adamant supporter of free markets.

  • Remsen Street Dweller

    Yes. There was a time when we managed to have wealthy people in this country and hospitals, libraries and other services to meet community needs.

  • ltap917

    A few years ago I saw my sister’s huge one bedroom apartment in StuyTown and I was amazed as her rent was less than 2,000 a month and her salary was over $150,000.
    She had more room in her apartment and better closet space than I had in my one bedroom in Brooklyn Heights which is valued at over $600,000.

  • Reggie

    I think I will steer clear of the polarized discussion below and instead just say, the William Shatner cover of Common People is superior: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ainyK6fXku0.

  • http://justbeyondthebend.com/ Joe Dudas

    I’m with you 100%. The truth is, we all benefit from the park. The park needs revenue to survive. If this development tucked on the very southern edge helps fund a beautiful park that as many as 108,000 people visit per weekend, then I’m a ‘go’.

    Not to mention more residents in that area are sure to add a wealth of new commerce to that West – most stretch of Atlantic which seems to struggle a bit.

  • Derick

    Effete snobs and nattering nabobs. Yeah, Spiro Agnew gave us an appropriate description for Schomp/Hale.

  • guest

    LOL. Lori reminds me of the unforzen caveman lawyer skit on saturday night live from the about 10-15 years ago. “I’m just an idealist who finds this whole complicated topic fascinating and am asking some questions so that we can all have a conversation…” No – you’re not some innocent bystander. You are the lead plaintiff in a lawsuit you brought to stop the BBP from completing it’s financial plan and provide about 150 units of affordable housing to boot. That’s fine, but own it. Once you file the lawsuit, you don’t get to play that card anymore.
    https://au.tv.yahoo.com/plus7/snl-archives/-/watch/20431099/unfrozen-cave-man-lawyer-3/

  • Daddyo

    If the sun sets in the west (over New Jersey), these new buildings will have a tough time “blotting out the sunset” — except, perhaps, at the new LICH condos. More condos! Hooray!

  • gatornyc

    I would take the time to provide a detailed response, but there isn’t a shred of truth in a single thing you said. To quote Twain: “Never argue with a fool, onlookers may not be able to tell the difference.”

  • johnny cakes

    Mr. Crusty, the waterfront was supposed to be a public park… not a condo development. It was hijacked by the real state developers, and what’s left of the waterfront should be returned for the use of all the public. Not for use as hotels – nor for affordable or unaffordable housing. It should be used as public parkland.

  • Bill

    Actually it’s all true, I work in real estate in that exact area

  • Banet

    For the record, the house Ms. Schomp lives in with her boyfriend is not “less expensive than mose of the fancy BHA people’s homes”… the house they live in sold for between $7 million and $8 million dollars. It’s one of the 5 highest prices ever paid in all of Brooklyn.

    Not only that, the taller of the two proposed buildings — and possibly both — will be squarely in view from their back yard.

    Ms. Schomp’s efforts may be extremely noble… or tremendously selfish. I suggest the editors of this blog interview her and ask her directly.

  • gatornyc

    With all due respect Bill, you must not be very good at what you do. First, there are two retail spaces open in the building: Wag Club (pet day care/boarding/supplies) and Waterfront Wines. OBBP residents and the surrounding area look forward to more retail which will come in time. Superstorm Sandy certainly had an impact as did the Great Recession (which hurt retail everywhere), but the lender’s failure to approve potential tenants was the biggest factor as it heavily favored national tenants to whom the location is not preferable.

    Second, OBBP has been on fire the past few years with almost all units selling at or close to ask in a short time. Most unit owners who bought in late 2009 or early 2010 have seen there units more than double in value in just 4 year! I guess only a fool buys such an apartment. Anyone who bought at OBBP in recent years is well in the black.

    Third, no units were “coverted to rentals.” Rather, approximately 10-15% of units were rented temporarily by the sponsor a few years ago until the real estate market picked up. Virtually none of those units remain. Just the opposite of “unsellable,” the building is sold out including those units previously rented by the sponsor. You really should go talk to your friends at Corcoran, Sotheby’s, etc., who are all doing really well with their listings at OBBP.

    So, like I said, not a single word of truth regarding OBBP. What all of this has to do with the issue of further development on Pier 6, I have no idea.

  • BrooklynBugle

    You’ve been trolled. Troll has been banned.

  • gatornyc

    Thanks, figured that might be the case. Was worth the time as it is always good to get out accurate information.