Biviano and Simon Spar Over Real Estate Contributions

The Doug Biviano campaign today questioned fellow 33rd District City Council candidate Jo Anne Simon’s connections to developers and real estate interests.

At last week’s debate for candidates for the council seat, Simon said that she “[hasn’t] accepted any contributions from real estate interests” in response to a question about her resistance to taking a position on the Gowanus Superfund site.

An examination of the New York City campaign finance board’s database, however, shows campaign contributions totaling $10,498 from individuals who list “real estate” in their occupation title.

Karen Johnson, the Simon campaign’s political director, characterized the Biviano’s campaign’s claims as “totally untrue.”

“I’m very disappointed,” she said. “He’s resorted to distortions because he’s desperate.” Johnson said that the contributors listed do not have ties to large developers in the city, and are simply small property owners and landlords.

Johnson also said that, in total, the Simon campaign has raised more money from more people than any other campaign. IIndeed, there have been 835 contributions totaling $108,033.00 for the Simon campaign, compared to the 306 contributions totaling $24,068.00 for the Biviano campaign.

Henry McCaslin, Biviano campaign spokesman, said “The fact is she has a long and troubling history of placating developers that goes back to the organization she created to divide the opposition to Atlantic Yards. It is not surprising that real estate interests are now lining up to fill her pockets in this campaign.”

Share this Story:

, ,

  • Community Reactivist

    Please stop maligning Biviano because he’s not a Brooklyn Heights country squire. I disagree with almost all of his tactics and views, but it seems that certain opiners here will soon be saying that only homeowners should vote, that families of over 2 people should have to live in a mansion, and that building superintendent cannot run for office. Maybe a caste system would be a better way to run the neighborhood?

    These kinds of discussions distract us all from the substantive issues of: What are the candidate’s positions, what is their experience, to whom they are obligated and what position do they aspire to? Please go rent Luis Bunuel’s “The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie ” before you mandate that candidates should live just as you do.

  • the banned

    Biviano is an ex superintendent. he was fired. hello?
    Good luck to the co-op in trying to move him out. I give it two years at least free rent.

  • Smarty Smarkowitz

    Banned you sound like a bitter resident of his building. Actually I’d say you are one.

  • Eddie The Eagle

    Do you have any evidence to back up that claim? Are you the nosy underemployed neighbor from across the street or something?

  • communityreactivist

    From what I understand — and I probably, admittedly, don’t have all the facts — the situation is more compliated than that. Do you have any more specific information? Do you live in the same building? At the same time, obviously he has roots and residence in the community. Why not talk about issues not gossip and conjecture? Steve Levin’s office isn’t even in the district from what I read. That is more significant considering his backers and the size of his war chest. That is worth short conversation.

  • Homer Fink

    Doug spoke about his job situation at length on the Homer Fink Show recently. I suggest everyone give it a listen here: http://brooklynheightsblog.com/podcasts

    The Banned, we’ve been honest with you about your situation regarding comments, we’d appreciated the same in return regarding whatever axe you have to grind regarding candidate Biviano.

  • nabeguy

    the banned, correct me if I’m wrong:
    1. you are a resident in the building where Biviano is/was a superintendant
    2. you didn’t tip him at Christmas.

  • http://bivforbrooklyn.com/index.php/squibb Doug Biviano

    Btw, I have an open door on Montague Street. Everyone is welcome, stop by anytime.