Brooklyn Heights Rabbi Talks Creation

Congregation B’nai Avraham’s Rabbi Simcha Weinstein writes this week in his Broken Halo column about Darwin’s theory of Evolution,  “controversy” about Brooklyn Heights’ native Jennifer Connelly’s new movie Creation and how scientists aren’t bad people at all.

Broken Halo: Evolution says that a dumb universe can create intelligent beings. But we read in Genesis that our intelligent universe just looks dumb – it is smarter than we can perceive.

That’s not to say we human beings aren’t dumb: if you want to see how badly natural selection works, just watch some reality TV!

Some respectable Torah scholars have tried to align Judaism with evolution. Yet none of them can square the famous creation story in Genesis with Darwin’s theories, or their own.

Their error stems from the commonplace belief that evolution has been scientifically proven and therefore cannot be questioned. This is simply not the case. While Darwin’s theories were quickly embraced as handy (and sometimes sinister) metaphors by some artists, writers and philosophers – not to mention a famous dictator or two — they haven’t withstood more rigorous examination.

At bottom, we’re stuck with a handful of fossils, lots of speculation– and plenty of unanswered questions.

The human mind recoils at the prospect of having to say, “I don’t understand.” Any theory is better than none. As far as many moderns are concerned, even a half-baked theory is better than the alternative: religious faith.

Share this Story:

, , ,

  • http://instaputz.blogspot.com ts

    “While Darwin’s theories were quickly embraced as handy (and sometimes sinister) metaphors by some artists, writers and philosophers – not to mention a famous dictator or two — they haven’t withstood more rigorous examination.”

    I realize the rabbi thinks he’s got a theological obligation not to take science too seriously, but still, this guy’s an embarrassment.

  • Drew

    It’s really unfortunate when educated people make uneducated statements. These comments make for great one-liners (just watch some reality TV!), but demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding of natural selection, the theory of evolution, and even the definition of the word “theory.”

    As Rabbi Weinstein might say:
    At bottom, we’re stuck with handful of oversimplified and uninformed arguments, lots of speculation on what “the scientists” think – and plenty of unanswered questions that we never bothered to ask.

  • tpot

    Science (and Darwin) does a fine job of explaining (through theory) how the physical world came to be. Religion, on the other hand, does a fine job explaining the human experience of the physical world. Science does not do very good job describing joy, friendship, or love. Religion does not do a very good job explaining how a television works.

  • Drew

    @tpot

    But here’s the key: Science doesn’t try to explain the human experience of the physical world, but religion does try to explain how the physical world came to be.

  • tpot

    Agreed. I’m not defending the Rabbi. I’m just pointing out that religion and science don’t necessarily need to be at odds. Each holds potential for a meaning in human experience and existence. Science need not explain (or be at odds with) religion, and religion need not explain (or be at odds with) science. Indeed, both can easily celebrate the other. It’s simply sad when they do not.

  • Adam G

    Ugh, how embarassing to have this nonsense associated with my religion (which actually has no issue with natural selection and evolution).

  • Adam

    gerald schroeder – “the science of god”

    read that.

  • Andrew Porter

    As I always say, the world was actually created most recently on last Tuesday, about 7:13pm. God keeps finding more stuff He forgot to include, so keeps redoing Creation. I hope He (or She) gets it right soon…