The People in Your Neighborhood: Dumbo Mom Demands Action for Gun Sense

Today, we are pleased to introduce “People in Your Neighborhood,” a Q & A feature that we hope will become a regular and welcomed addition to the Brooklyn Heights Blog.  In today’s installment, we spotlight Jaime Pessin (pictured left), the campaign lead for the New York chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.  Jaime lives in DUMBO with her husband and two young children. She moved to NYC in 2005 and has lived in DUMBO since 2008.

What was the catalyst for your involvement in gun sense advocacy? 

My son was in pre-K during the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, and that event exploded my world. That 20 first-graders could be gunned down in the sanctity of their classrooms was unfathomable to me, and I was virtually paralyzed with grief. A few days later, Wayne La Pierre – the president of the NRA – held a press conference in which he argued that classroom teachers should be armed to protect their kids, and I had a mental picture of my son’s elderly pre-K teacher packing heat and wrestling a “bad guy” to the ground. That was when I got mad. That was the moment that kick started my activism.

How did you become involved with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense?

During the week between the shooting and the “good guy with a gun” press conference, a friend had liked a new Facebook page that had been set up by Shannon Watts, a mom in Indiana who was as grief-stricken and enraged as I was. Somehow she connected with some moms in Brooklyn and in Silicon Valley and other places around the country, and Moms Demand Action was born. In the early days, it was a total frenzy, with people around the country reaching out and trying to start chapters. On Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, we had our first-ever March Across the Brooklyn Bridge and Rally for Gun Sense, with nearly 1,000 people turning out to demand stronger gun laws.

What’s amazing is that the organization was literally started on Facebook by a mom typing furiously on a laptop at her kitchen counter. Now we have chapters in every state, with more than 3 million members.

3) What is your role within the organization?

I have a couple of roles within the organization. I am the campaign lead for our NY state chapter, which means I help organize various efforts locally.  Obviously we have a huge focus on passing legislation nationally, but we’ve also got education and corporate culture campaigns, too.  For example, our BeSMART campaign encourages people to make sure their kids don’t unintentionally access guns…[and] helps educate parents to those risks.  We have a great presentation that we’d be happy to do at your PTA or church group or other community organization – reach out [to our NY Chapter Facebook page] if you’re interested.

The other role I have with Moms Demand Action is that I’m on a small team creating the Mother’s Dream Quilt Project. The quilt project is a series of quilts that incorporates fabric from victims and survivors of gun violence, along with squares created by people who haven’t been personally affected, but who care about the issue. You can see the first seven quilts and read the stories behind each square at our website. There are currently a dozen quilts touring the country.

Jaime Pessin Stands with Comedian Amy Schumer and Senator Chuck Schumer at #AimingForChange Press Conference

Jaime Pessin (left) stands with Comedian Amy Schumer and Senator Chuck Schumer at #AimingForChange Press Conference, held Sunday.  Photo courtesy of Moms Demand Action.

If you could pass one piece of gun sense legislation, what would it be? 

I’m going to cheat and give you two pieces of legislation, because they go hand in hand. They both address the aspect of our gun problem that infuriates me most: Terrible laws in other states contribute directly to crime in our neighborhoods.

The first thing that would be a huge help in New York would be to mandate background checks on all gun sales nationally. A lot of people don’t realize that this is not already the law. Currently our system requires federally licensed firearms dealers to conduct a background check. So when you go to a gun store, you get a background check, it usually takes a couple of minutes, and then if your record is clean, you go on your way. But that law doesn’t apply to private sellers. So when someone posts online “I’ve got a few guns to sell, who wants to buy ’em”, they’re not required to do background checks before they sell those guns. Similarly, if a private seller brings 100 guns to a gun show, he can sell them all without conducting a background check on any buyer.

NY state has laws that require background checks on all gun sales. But that doesn’t stop people from buying guns in other states without a background check and bringing them to New York. In fact, 90 percent of guns recovered from NYC crimes were purchased out of state (if you look at the state as a whole, the number is 70 percent). In some of the recent high profile killings of NYPD officers, the guns were traced to Georgia.

The second, related, piece of legislation that I’d like to see passed is a federal anti-trafficking bill. Sen. Gillibrand recently introduced legislation that would make it a federal crime to traffic guns; it’s shocking that this isn’t already a federal crime. Just the other week, a man was indicted for running guns from Georgia to NYC, and even our local prosecutors are calling for a federal anti-trafficking statute so they can charge them with a federal crime.

If we enacted universal background checks on gun sales and a federal anti-trafficking law, we would be able to save a lot of lives.

How can other like-minded people get involved?  What does Moms Demand Action need right now?

Moms Demand Action is always looking for new volunteers! We need people to make calls to new members (ie phone banking), we need people to help write letters to the editor, we need people to attend and volunteer at events (especially our 4th annual Brooklyn Bridge march, which will be held in May 2016), we need people to meet with legislators. There are a ton of entry points and ways to get involved, from showing up in person to making calls from home.

The first step would be to fill out this form to join our local chapter: www.momsdemandaction.org/join

We’ve got a membership meeting coming up on the evening of Nov. 4 in Brooklyn Heights. We welcome any new members who would like to learn more about what we’re doing. You can RSVP here: https://act.everytown.org/event/moms-demand-action-event/1729/signup/

Is there is a special person in the neighborhood you would like to see featured? Comment away!

Share this Story:

, , , , , ,

  • Concerned

    This is awesome!!! I always watched WSW from afar and never had been engaged by him/her(?)… It’s a real humdinger when in my first experience with WSW, my thinking is called “amazing and disgusting”. Moreover, I may be the Black Pope of the NWO…or possibly have a poisoned mind from chemtrails and fluoride in the water…hell, why not all three!!!
    Look WSW, your comment: “So every or every key thing we do should searchable” is from the basic section of the jerk’s handbook for arguing. It’s called “polarizing” and it’s childish. Of course not everything should be tracked; but dangerous weapons SHOULD be tracked. To toss it back to you, do you believe that we should not have driver’s licenses? Car registration?

  • Brixtony

    Makes sense to me. Can’t wait for Will o’ the whisp’s faux arguments. Lock and load, boyo.

  • Bee

    Featured Person

  • Bee

    Aaron Kominos-Smith is a comedian in Dumbo and runs the monthly Dumbo comedy show. You should feature him as a “special person in the neighborhood” His website is funnyaaron.com

  • Brixtony

    I looked them up. Terrific organization, especially since they’re focused on small arms which actually are responsible for more murders and suicides than the so-called assault rifles that our conservative friend explained. thanks for the heads up, neighbor.

  • RJG

    We’re lucky to live in New York.

    There are currently two openings on New York’s highest court, the Court of Appeals in Albany. Governor Cuomo will be making nominations for the openings in the next few weeks and we can be sure he will be aware of their records on gun control.

    The NRA has called Governor Cuomo “America’s Most-Anti-Gun Governor….” (NRAILA.org, January 9, 2013)

  • RJG

    NOMINATION FOR Q&A: A representative of the Doe Fund

    I think it’s a very positive organization in so many ways. Workers are out 24/7 the year round in our downtown BID and Brooklyn Bridge Park. I’m sure other areas are being covered as well.

  • Willow Street Watch

    Its amazing and deceptive for decades of anti second amendment advocates to have used the cars = Guns argument. Cars are for transportation on public highways. If you have a car on/in your own land and only operate it there you need no license or governmental approval. A LOT of rancid environmental tand assorted NWO types would like cars operated on remote private lands subject to all govt licensing.. There is ALSO a big cheering section for govt/private tracking of all vehicles. Is that all right with everyone here?.

    Guns are a very different case, What you call “dangerous devices” can sit unused for years. Waiting for a legitimate reason for use be it life protection in a domestic setting or national defense.
    They sit without activity in private quarters or on the private person of a citizen remaining inactive until serious need arises.

    Thus, your comparison is invalid…or more directly, its bogus

    Now, let’s get back and have any of you address the amount of lives SAVED by guns annualy..and the inverse ratio. of crime and guns.

  • Willow Street Watch

    Well, he’s the most rabidly anti the entire concept of the right of personal defence. In this he is not alone. Centuries of statist types be they monarchs, tyrannical governments, dictators or just sqalid politicians have hated the entire concept of individual right before the law. And they become totally livid at the mention of an individual having the very basic right of self defense. Cuomo’s father had a strong far left streak.His son is well, highly self centered and he is simply hostire to individuals having the practical ability to detur or defend against criminal activity.

    But the pro second sdmendment advocates are ALSO in my experience a piece of work. In case after case they have collected huge sums from gun owners and then very suspiciously not defended second amendment interests. And they won’t tell supporters why they engaged in the activity…or inactivity at critical moments they did.

    The two great examples of betrayal of gun owners interests is the NY “SAFE” act and the UN resolution on small arms (which of course transcends US constitutional guarantees for American citizens.
    In both these and hundreds of other glaring cases major pro gun groups have made sure they did not prevent legislation and regulation that government or the internationalist establishment really wanted. Gun owners have themselves been very remiss not to keep their organizations honest and insist on them being effective. THEN after Cuomo rush passes the SAFE act, they obediently line up to register their weopons like good little school children. Even though there were a series of good, fully legal alternatives. Hey, why weren’t there thousands of gun owners outside the UN???
    (The gun owners should be the ones marching across the Brooklyn Bridge…!)

  • displacer

    hahhaha jesus christ, why don’t you stretch out the X axis on that chart a little further? You know do know that

    1) the midpoint of the chart is 2 homicides per 100,000,
    2) and the number that makes you say “lordy” is 3.5 homicides per 100,000, and
    3) that data is years old with the current firearms homicide rate of the US now 30% lower than claimed there, as per the recently released 2014 FBI UCR

    right?

    When you look at the homicide trends of the entire world (rather than just picking a handful of countries with lower homicide rates than the US) you can see that, despite the great gnashing of teeth about the US being the murder capital of world or whatever, we’re actually pretty safe:

    http://www.geocurrents.info/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/World-Murder-Rate-map.png

    and every single country that’s a darker shade than we are has tighter gun control laws as well. The UN ODC keeps a worldwide ranking of the homicide rates of every nation and right now the US is about 110th out of 216th, and well below the worldwide average of 6.2 homicides per 100,000 despite having the most liberal gun laws of any country with a functioning government. The real correlation you see between violence and differing countries is socioeconomic, plain and simple

  • Willow Street Watch

    The ONLY way firearms in private hands can perform their function as a safeguard of freedom is for the government, international organizations and any perspective foreign hostile government NOT knowing where the guns are and who exactly holds firearms. Make NO mistake, no matter what, for example, some upper house of the casino type with their internationalist prattle, trys to tell you, guns held in anonymously are a VERY MAJOR reason we are still free and it represents a critical sword of Damocles over the heads of every political figure or bureaucrat with entertaining ideas of improper personal concentration of power.

    This is one of the most eternal truths of civil function, without the most strong constrictions and potential powerful answers to abuse of power, govrtrnments and private entities functioning as policy making and implementing, simply run out of control, usually resultion in very significant damage to the nation involved and also usually widespread loss of life.

    America’s founding fathers in thier wisdom, placed very powerful safeguard systems against the corruption and disaster which befell so many nations and civilations before thirr time.

    In our time, it is our responsibility to maintain these safeguard systems, the last line of which is arms distributed throughout the population, as well as the ability and willingness effectivly employ arms in the defense of the nation and freedom.

  • displacer

    It’s a shame the CDC got slapped on the wrist like that for wasting literally millions of dollars on grants to Arthur Kellermann and Garen Wintemute so they could manufacture a string of highly-contentious case studies which basically claimed that having a gun in your home drew murderers to you through… idk, magic or something? I’ve read through them and they’re some of the worst junk science I’ve ever read I’ve seen, their methodology couldn’t even actually confirm that there was a gun in the home of the deceased (they used surveys of families and asked if they _thought_ there were guns) and there didn’t even have to be a gun in the home when the murder happened. Did someone happen to remember that the deceased borrowed and returned a deer rifle up to a year before they were killed? That was counted as a gun owner. The samples sizes used were always just a few hundred people from seemingly-random cities in the South, and they loved to use a technique called oversampling in the exact opposite way it’s supposed to be used in order to make sure the sample sizes were as much as 80% of the highest-risk group possible (young urban males) instead of an actual representative sample of the population of the US.

    The CDC was the organization banned from spending money on studies, no other government, academic, or private institution had to endure these restrictions. There’s several agencies of the government whose primary job along with law enforcement is to study violent crime trends and prevention (ATF, DOJ, FBI, etc.) On top of that university criminology departments and private special-interest groups are still studying crime, or am I just imagining all my halfwit acquaintances posting anti-gun clickbait on Facebook with headlines that amount to SHOCKING NEW GUN STUDY TOTALLY PROVES STUPID REDNECK GUNHAVERS ON WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY, BUT DON’T WORRY YOU’RE COOL AND GOOD AND RIGHT

  • Willow Street Watch

    Remember, I’m not assaulting your character, but I’m calling your attention to how wrong and dangerous the direction of your thinking is proceeding. Your referencing to tracking may be a support of registration, a very dangerous to a free society advocacy. If your comment refers to physical tracking technology, like RFID or more advanced classified methods. This is even worse that the former possible meaning.

    Again, no one is attacking you, but be careful what damage you may cause to your countrycountry.

  • Conservative Jerry

    The car analogy is baseless. Driving a car is a PRIVILEGE, not a RIGHT.
    Do you advocate a license to practice religion? Must one apply for a permit to prevent unreasonable search and seizure?

  • Concerned

    This is how sick these people are…that owning gun is as much of a freedom as the right to practice religion. So insane. Do any of you conservatives actually read the constitution!?! Are you a member of a well regulated militia, conservative Jerry!?!

  • Willow Street Watch

    I ask YOU do some reading, the militia in its original meaning was the armed male population. An invasion is underway or feared?, a wild animal has entered your area? A criminal gang is about threatening a town or city…EVERY ABLE BODIED MAN…WITH HIS GUN…UPON ORDERS/ALARM BY THE LEGAL AUTHORITIES, TURNED OUT!

    THATS THE MILITIA…

    yes, a well regulated militia IS necessary to a free society but that regulation was the response general obligation to respond the local or regional or nationwide threat or outright emergency. There was a high level of public sprit then (which the leaders and radical activists of the last forty years have drained out of our country……)

    I suggest if you access some sources of real history;

  • Willow Street Watch

    Of course, there. are many, many statutes both state and federal which would stop a lot of these street/drug gangs cold. We just need a GOOD government that is serious about restoring order. But with a government which is allowing drugs and foreign felons to FLOOD into this country, the hope to stop gang activity and street crime now falls to the citizen…the average American!!!

    The people in this country the sovereign…not the government.

  • Conservative Jerry

    Absolutely.
    An individual has a right to self defense as much as they have a right to practice religion.

  • Brixtony

    Dear neighbors:
    I’m tired of feeding the troll and will no longer respond or comment on this unbalanced, paranoid, fascistic, ignorant and mean spirited individual’s drivel. Perhaps it’ll find another bridge to hide under. As Robert Heinlein wrote, Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.’ Adios.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    Maybe, in light of the way these claims play out in reality, we shouldn’t take those notions for granted?

    It makes for a nice-sounding bumper sticker to say something like “an individual has a right to self defense” but why must self defense default to use of lethal force, often bypassing the course of justice? Maybe we’re misinterpreting “right to self defense”; people have a right not to be attacked, but why should that mean they have a right to attack or kill others?

    If now was an appropriate time to give a suggestion for a solution I’d say we (as a society) ought to make an effort to upgrade our defensive technologies in a way that aligns with an updated view of the idea of protecting oneself. What we have right now is medieval or older: “me no want get attacked so me carry bigger truncheon than other guy; better him dead than me.”

    Why haven’t we developed more effective nonlethal weapons technologies that could stop an assailant and allow justice to take its course? We are so many people still looking at lethal weapons as a solution, rather than the problem they obviously are?

    If you read my comments you’ll see I’m not gung-ho about weapons restrictions, but I do think we need to take a harder look at our paradigms regarding violence and self-defense. Do you disagree?

    Anyway, we’ve strayed far away from the local issue so maybe we’re too off-topic at this point.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    Don’t be disheartened. I don’t know who WSW is but he’s not immune to humor or charm. You just have to pick your battles. :)

  • Brixtony

    Thanks. I’m not disheartened, and enjoy a witty discussion. This person is only operating at a 50% wit rate and loves to show his “expertise ” on a variety of issues with a Trump/ Carson level of competence. Waste of time really.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    For whatever it’s worth, participating in comments on a neighborhood blog is a waste of time to begin with. Takes that perfect cocktail of opinionatedness and boredom and available energy that we’re all guilty of.

    In fact if I didn’t feel so guilty about it I probably wouldn’t post anonymously.

  • Brixtony

    I’m laid up with a pinched nerve and too much down time – you’re right about the energy waste – time to get back to producing art, or in my case music.

  • Conservative Jerry

    They do not have a right to kill others. They have a right to respond to a threat in such a manner as is appropriate to neutralize that threat. It’s called the Use of Force Continuum or the Escalation of Force. There is no right to not be attacked, only a right -and as some may feel, an obligation – to respond.

    Perhaps we have digressed, but this topic and this neighbor’s efforts also extend beyond mere local concerns.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    I have no problem with the idea that someone has a right to neutralize an immediate threat to themselves or others. I just think that our automatic equation of neutralizing threats with using *lethal* force is obsolete and long-overdue for revision. As a species we have advanced, technologically and philosophically, too far to still be using killing to prevent killing, especially while simultaneously being indignant about it.

  • Greg

    Hi Willow,

    No, you are clearly confused.

    I’m happy that you’ve read a book. But you need to understand that just because you read a book doesn’t mean a) the book is correct, b) its author is legitimate, or c) others in the academic community with equal or greater stature don’t have wildly different opinions on the subject.

    I suggest you research the concept of peer review. Your arguments are clearly passionate, and I greatly respect your passion, but they lack the intellectual rigor that’s necessary for them to meaningfully persuade.

    I’m familiar with the book you mention. John Lott, the author, has been seriously discredited by many respectable sources.

    The Stanford Law Review on “More Guns, Less Crime”: “seriously miscoded their new county dataset in ways that irretrievably undermine every original regression result that they present in their response. As a result, the new PW regressions must simply be disregarded. Correcting PW’s empirical mistakes once again shows that the more guns, less crime hypothesis is without credible statistical support.”

    In 2003, Northwestern Law Professor James Lindgen began an ethics inquiry that determined Lott fabricated a major survey that was core to his arguments. He was in active communication with Lott, who was unable to provide a consistent response.

    And Lott has of course been proven to make up fake personas to support him (“Mary Rosh”).

    So Willow, I’m really glad you’re trying to educate yourself. But you need to understand a single book by, to put it as generously as possible, a highly controversial character with a struggling reputation, is just one small step toward real understanding.

    Cheers.

  • Willow Street Watch

    Hour statement is (also among the less informed types here) amazing and ignorant of the real world today.

    Much of gun control IS at an effective end…why? Well just exactly because now, Joe schmoe CAN cook up an assault rifle or almost any classic handgun.

    About. Thirty years ago the computerized milling machines came into being. My firm took delivery of one early in May of 1983. That was just the latest generation at the time. But when we took delivery, installed it and put it into operation, we noticed as a deal sweetener the manufacturer included a well, object scanner…this was a clear chamber containing several lasers and optical receivers.

    Place any object in the chamber and the lasers would scan its shape, size and contours to a micro degree, then digitalize the results. The miller would then make an exact copy of what had been scanned!!
    Anyone with NO machining training could make a fully finished perfect copy of what had been scanned!!! This is now very very old object replication technology.

  • Greg

    Brixtony,

    While yes, this is an anonymous blog that’s only worth so much energy, I’m highly encouraged that you and most everyone else here set a standard of civility that keeps this place viable as a community resource.

    If this community was overrun with characters like Willow Street Watch, it would have decayed into irrelevance a long time ago.

    But it’s not. WSW is, thankfully, being kept well in check here.

    Keep pushing for a higher standard here, as you’re able, and I and your other peers will support you.

  • Willow Street Watch

    Today the 3-D printers have arrived which make a copy to a very fine degree of any scanned object in plastic, including ballistic grade ultra high strength plastics.

    Computerized milling machines and 3D printers can make ANY barrel, cylinder, slide, hammer, part of a trigger group and…any frame or receiver. You don’t even have to scan a firearm. You can now BUY the ZIP DRIVE or other memory media or DOWNLOAD the file to make ANY firearm part including the receiver/frame in 100% finished form.

    Today any dolt can make any firearm. Or you can just order the receiver/frame in 80% finished form, finish the final simple machining cand simply assemble any firearm in an evening.

    Now what shall we do? Register zip drives? Have instant checks for thousands of milling machines or their owners? Sure, let’s turn to full pre-crime measures here…

    Any non-thinker who wants to ban or greatly restrict guns had better think of what happened with firecrackers in the earl 70’s hen the brilliant consumer products safety commission moved to ban packs of small firecrackers as inherently dangerious. What follows was a real lesson. Instantly, a huge underground fireworks industry sprang up! Every type down south ran down their basement and began to make fireworks. Of course, they’re not going to make low profit labor intensive lady fingers. Immediately New York and every other major city was flooded with M80’s and Super M-80’s which could blow your hand off. The brilliant CPSC backed off and peace was restored. But this of course teaches a real lesson that is far beyond the ken of the average marching housewife. Ban legal guns and with the demand today, you’ll instantly get illegally produced guns and they won’t be fine target revolvers. The money is in quick and cheap to produce fully automatic weapons.

    I suggest everyone THINK what thier actions are really going to produce….