Police Cart Burns Near Pier 1

Karl and his cam were on hand around noon today when a small NYPD vehicle caught fire on the path next to Pier 1, Brooklyn Bridge Park, producing an impressive plume of smoke. He was able to get some good video until one of the gens d’armes (Hey! It’s Bastille Day) objected (update: to use a favorite Finkism, objected err somethin’). Video after the jump.

NYPD shoos Karl away from harm.

Publisher’s note: We would like to thank the NYPD officer who asked Karl to stop video taping the fire.  While commenters here seem to think the officer was attempting to stomp out coverage of a local news event,  we can only assume that the officer was only very concerned about Mr. J’s safety and we thank him.  Seriously folks, Karl wasn’t dancing or anything like that.

Share this Story:

, ,

  • hicksanthrope

    omg.. my heart broke when I saw this. Those tiny carts.. so so so important to keeping nyc safe. I clutch my children closer. I lock my doors and wedge a chair under the knob. I fear the day when all the tiny carts go up in smoke.

  • David on Middagh

    It was a relatively long time before someone commented; I think because this was a fire, and no-one wanted to appear snarky lest karma kick them in the pinto beans.

    (I don’t believe in karma, but I notice that it sometimes happens anyway.)

  • weatherman

    I saw this vehicle moments before it burst in to flames. It passed me as I exited the park, and it had a smell that reminded me of burning brakes. Some other visitors commented on its smell to the cluster of policemen standing at the entrance saying “shouldn’t someone tell him?” – needless to say, they did nothing.

  • lois

    Karl, How do you always manage to be “on the spot” when these things occur? Hmmm. Anyhow, be glad they did not confiscate your camera!

  • Mr. Crusty

    Maybe Karl was the arsonist? Anything for good video.

  • AEB

    Love the music–very Götterdämmerung.Or Fifth Dimension?.

  • Regina

    The pig had no authority to tell you to stop taking video.

  • AEB

    He might have been trying to protect Karl from possible danger, Regina–and to protect himself should Karl have been hurt under his “watch.”

  • Mr. Crusty

    “Pig”? As a former law enforcement officer I take exception. Using a word like “pig” to describe police officers tells me so much more about the author than it does about police officers.

  • WillowSt.Neighbor

    Mr. Crusty,
    Exactly!

  • Regina

    A pig is a cop that abuses their authority.

  • weegee

    Anyone has authority to photograph or videotape anything in public view, period.

    My favorite “make up the rules as you go along” incident occurred in the aftermath of a bus fire, in which the diesel fuel ignited several parked cars near the Verrazano Bridge. Several other media and I were at the scene, which had long since been secured. The FD chiefs knew we were there, and didn’t care. Diesel fuel, mind you, has an incredibly high ignition temperature — you can strike a match across a puddle of the stuff and be fine. However, we were told by one individual from PD that our cameras and lights were hazardous, and for our own safety, etc., etc. When we pointed out that the half dozen fire engines COVERED in rotating lights and strobes were driving through the spillage (on their way home at that point) the true reason for the directive—he felt like it–became clear.

    Or the time that an officer declared the sidewalk at West 25th and 10th Ave. “private property” (I shoulda demanded to speak to the landowner!) in the midst of another scene.

    This is the way of life for those of us who cover spot news every day; we shrug it off, because otherwise we’d be spending more time filing civilian complaints than doing our job and, in the end, it achieves nothing. It didn’t used to be that way, but you live and let live, and try to do your job as best you can.

    My 15 years of documenting heroics and knowing what PD goes through every day trumps my First-Amendment-Saber-Rattling. I call BS when I see it, but that’s about it.

  • lois

    No need for using the term “pig” and he was not necessarily preventing Karl from taping (he did not seize the camera) – he was keeping Karl away from danger and making room for the firemen.

  • Karl Junkersfeld

    I had no problem with the policeman asking me to move back. The cart had already exploded and there was a possibility it might explode again. Just wish I got the first explosion on tape. Got there a minute too late. lol

  • Mr. Crusty

    As the update below indicates, the officer was more than likely concerned for Karl’s safety. But that doesn’t matter to Regina, she obviously has her preconceived ideas about police officers I don’t imagine it will make much of a difference to her what the officer’s intentions were. They are after all the instruments of the fascist state she is so valiantly fighting. But her knee jerk reaction is entirely understandable because I have similarly formed an opinion of Regina with limited information.

    Below is the update from the publisher:

    “Publisher’s note: We would like to thank the NYPD officer who asked Karl to stop video taping the fire.  While commenters here seem to think the officer was attempting to stomp out coverage of a local news event,  we can only assume that the officer was only very concerned about Mr. J’s safety and we thank him.  Seriously folks, Karl wasn’t dancing or anything like that.”

  • Mr. Crusty

    @weegee, I obviously can’t comment on your personal experiences, and officers may have impeded your video taping unreasonably but my experience with the media is that they often think they have a right to interfere with emergency services doing their job. Officers are always taught to create a perimeter at a scene outside of which the public is moved not only for their safety but also to facilitate the ongoing emergency services.

    You may be willing to risk your safety to get close to a news worthy situation but police officers have to err on the side of caution and that often means moving the media further away than perhaps they would want.

    Anybody that lives in NYC knows how the media can behave at some of these situations. The police have to control the scene and that often can be perceived as stifling the constitutional rights of the media.

  • David on Middagh

    First, I think Mr. Crusty didn’t click the “dancing” link about the arrest of a middle-aged couple on a subway platform, and would be as shocked as I was to learn that the Charleston is still performed.

    Second, I’ve watched the video several times and I see no shooing away. All I see is an officer of the law moving forward, hat held out in anguish, as if soliciting donations for a new cart. And I’m sure Karl gave him something, so can we move on?

  • Mr. Crusty

    David on Middagh did the dancing couple belong to the media? We’re they video taping something that the police prohibited? That was the issue I was responding to. Not sure what relevance the dancing couple has to do with my comments on the media.

  • David on Middagh

    It doesn’t.

  • Sal Manilla

    I bet Regina is a pig herself. I mean the fugly kind.

  • Regina

    “Crusty” that’s a peculiar handle for an ex cop. I think of cops as soft and doughy with glaze or frosting. But you’re right, I don’t like fascism or its enforcers.

    The argument “the cop was only acting out of concern for the videographer” is BS, as he would have said only to move back, not to stop recording. It is a clear example of abuse of authority.

    Sal, wrong.

  • sajh

    Interesting: At noon, this happens. Then 4 hours later directly across the water, South Street Seaport’s Pier 17 catches fire.

  • sajh

    Regina,
    The police are trained to tell folks to stop recording. I assume b/c of liability issues (they didnt handle the situation right or something). And b/c the city doesnt want to pay out for mistakes (honest or willful), they cast a blind eye to this protocol. I remember helping with a citizen’s arrest of a crazy bi-polar guy in Astoria. And then was just txting my friend to say I was running late. One of the officiers made sure me and the other samaritan werent using our phones to video/take photos of the scene. I see both sides of the argument though. It’s a right taken away and should be used to keep egregious conduct violations in check but their protocol also helps keep down people just looking to sue for millions…

  • Regina

    As Weegee said, “Anyone has authority to photograph or videotape anything in public view, period.”
    The Police have no right to tell anyone to stop recording video or taking photographs. The city deserves to be sued for each and every civil rights violation. That typical example of New York’s Fattest, in the video, should be punished.

  • Mr. Crusty

    @sajh, “The police are trained to tell folks to stop recording”

    Where do you get this information. Can you back that up that the police are trained to tell folks to stop recording? Not true.

    @Regina you are truly a piece of excrement. So when Karl said that he was moved back for his own safety that is not enough for you. You called the cop a pig and now one of NY’s “Fattest” and that he should be punished. Punished? For doing his job and moving Karl away from a potentially dangerous situation?

    So tell me Regina, what did you get arrested for that caused all of this hatred of NY Police? Drugs? Prostitution?

  • hicks st guy

    Crusty, take the high road, you’re correct in this case, but you stoop to her level with the namecalling.

  • Regina

    I have no problem with anyone being asked to move for safety reasons. I have a problem with:

    “He was able to get some good video until one of the gens d’armes (Hey! It’s Bastille Day) objected”

    “the NYPD officer who asked Karl to stop video taping the fire”

    That’s what happened. If Karl had only been asked to move, why didn’t he keep on recording?

    Sorry, I’ve never been arrested, try again.

  • Mr. Crusty

    Regina, I guess the statement from the “victim” of this “pigs” actions doesn’t mean very much to you. Ignore what Karl has said himself and conveniently go with the words of someone that was not there and just make an off hand comment. Typical of someone of your ilk.

    So again what did the person with the video camera say?

    Karl J. said, “I had no problem with the policeman asking me to move back. The cart had already exploded and there was a possibility it might explode again.

    Karl, as silly as this seems, would you like to clear this up further for the “low information” types like Regina that struggle with basic reading comprehension? Did you feel the officer’s actions were to:

    1) prevent you from videotaping the fire because of the fascistic inclinations of all NYPD officers, (otherwise known as pigs), to violate your constitutional and God given rights to videotape the egregious and damning scooter fire?

    or

    2) prevent you from getting injured should the vehicle explode and you get impaled by a flying orange traffic cone.

  • Karl Junkersfeld

    To be honest, I didn’t hear what he said since I was so involved with filming the incident. My impression was that he just wanted me to move back. I never got the feeling that I had to stop videotaping. I just stopped filming since I had to concentrate on moving out of harms way. As I mentioned, I appreciated his concern. Hope this clarifies for those interested.

  • Mr. Crusty

    Thanks Karl. And btw I can’t tell you how much I appreciate all you do for this community. I have seen scores of your videos and I never tire of seeing whats going on in BH through your eyes. Thanks for all your efforts in documenting this beautiful neighborhood.