The People in Your Neighborhood: Dumbo Mom Demands Action for Gun Sense

Today, we are pleased to introduce “People in Your Neighborhood,” a Q & A feature that we hope will become a regular and welcomed addition to the Brooklyn Heights Blog.  In today’s installment, we spotlight Jaime Pessin (pictured left), the campaign lead for the New York chapter of Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America.  Jaime lives in DUMBO with her husband and two young children. She moved to NYC in 2005 and has lived in DUMBO since 2008.

What was the catalyst for your involvement in gun sense advocacy? 

My son was in pre-K during the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, and that event exploded my world. That 20 first-graders could be gunned down in the sanctity of their classrooms was unfathomable to me, and I was virtually paralyzed with grief. A few days later, Wayne La Pierre – the president of the NRA – held a press conference in which he argued that classroom teachers should be armed to protect their kids, and I had a mental picture of my son’s elderly pre-K teacher packing heat and wrestling a “bad guy” to the ground. That was when I got mad. That was the moment that kick started my activism.

How did you become involved with Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense?

During the week between the shooting and the “good guy with a gun” press conference, a friend had liked a new Facebook page that had been set up by Shannon Watts, a mom in Indiana who was as grief-stricken and enraged as I was. Somehow she connected with some moms in Brooklyn and in Silicon Valley and other places around the country, and Moms Demand Action was born. In the early days, it was a total frenzy, with people around the country reaching out and trying to start chapters. On Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, we had our first-ever March Across the Brooklyn Bridge and Rally for Gun Sense, with nearly 1,000 people turning out to demand stronger gun laws.

What’s amazing is that the organization was literally started on Facebook by a mom typing furiously on a laptop at her kitchen counter. Now we have chapters in every state, with more than 3 million members.

3) What is your role within the organization?

I have a couple of roles within the organization. I am the campaign lead for our NY state chapter, which means I help organize various efforts locally.  Obviously we have a huge focus on passing legislation nationally, but we’ve also got education and corporate culture campaigns, too.  For example, our BeSMART campaign encourages people to make sure their kids don’t unintentionally access guns…[and] helps educate parents to those risks.  We have a great presentation that we’d be happy to do at your PTA or church group or other community organization – reach out [to our NY Chapter Facebook page] if you’re interested.

The other role I have with Moms Demand Action is that I’m on a small team creating the Mother’s Dream Quilt Project. The quilt project is a series of quilts that incorporates fabric from victims and survivors of gun violence, along with squares created by people who haven’t been personally affected, but who care about the issue. You can see the first seven quilts and read the stories behind each square at our website. There are currently a dozen quilts touring the country.

Jaime Pessin Stands with Comedian Amy Schumer and Senator Chuck Schumer at #AimingForChange Press Conference

Jaime Pessin (left) stands with Comedian Amy Schumer and Senator Chuck Schumer at #AimingForChange Press Conference, held Sunday.  Photo courtesy of Moms Demand Action.

If you could pass one piece of gun sense legislation, what would it be? 

I’m going to cheat and give you two pieces of legislation, because they go hand in hand. They both address the aspect of our gun problem that infuriates me most: Terrible laws in other states contribute directly to crime in our neighborhoods.

The first thing that would be a huge help in New York would be to mandate background checks on all gun sales nationally. A lot of people don’t realize that this is not already the law. Currently our system requires federally licensed firearms dealers to conduct a background check. So when you go to a gun store, you get a background check, it usually takes a couple of minutes, and then if your record is clean, you go on your way. But that law doesn’t apply to private sellers. So when someone posts online “I’ve got a few guns to sell, who wants to buy ’em”, they’re not required to do background checks before they sell those guns. Similarly, if a private seller brings 100 guns to a gun show, he can sell them all without conducting a background check on any buyer.

NY state has laws that require background checks on all gun sales. But that doesn’t stop people from buying guns in other states without a background check and bringing them to New York. In fact, 90 percent of guns recovered from NYC crimes were purchased out of state (if you look at the state as a whole, the number is 70 percent). In some of the recent high profile killings of NYPD officers, the guns were traced to Georgia.

The second, related, piece of legislation that I’d like to see passed is a federal anti-trafficking bill. Sen. Gillibrand recently introduced legislation that would make it a federal crime to traffic guns; it’s shocking that this isn’t already a federal crime. Just the other week, a man was indicted for running guns from Georgia to NYC, and even our local prosecutors are calling for a federal anti-trafficking statute so they can charge them with a federal crime.

If we enacted universal background checks on gun sales and a federal anti-trafficking law, we would be able to save a lot of lives.

How can other like-minded people get involved?  What does Moms Demand Action need right now?

Moms Demand Action is always looking for new volunteers! We need people to make calls to new members (ie phone banking), we need people to help write letters to the editor, we need people to attend and volunteer at events (especially our 4th annual Brooklyn Bridge march, which will be held in May 2016), we need people to meet with legislators. There are a ton of entry points and ways to get involved, from showing up in person to making calls from home.

The first step would be to fill out this form to join our local chapter: www.momsdemandaction.org/join

We’ve got a membership meeting coming up on the evening of Nov. 4 in Brooklyn Heights. We welcome any new members who would like to learn more about what we’re doing. You can RSVP here: https://act.everytown.org/event/moms-demand-action-event/1729/signup/

Is there is a special person in the neighborhood you would like to see featured? Comment away!

Share this Story:

, , , , , ,

  • Minarchist Jerry

    I cited a Supreme Court decision. Not good enough? (It was “Heller,” I didn’t refer to it by name.)

  • Willow Street Watch

    I notice neither you or any casino oriented voice entered this discussion to this point and now just want to throw rocks. While the discourse here has been in terms of basic concepts. A simple google search of the subject would yield to any honestly interested researcher a ton of statistical and expert witness evidence for the positions I and the vast majority of Patriotic Americans support.

  • Willow Street Watch

    I’m sorry jerry the above response was intended for the delightful arch Stanton. Sorry for the wrong click.arch this was I for you….

  • Willow Street Watch

    As I responded to arch Stanton, which I misapplied to jerry, the discussion was on basic concepts, the supporting evidence and witness evidence is available by the TONS with a simple, honest
    Google search.

    I suggest anyone view the offerings by really the Best 2nd amendment advocacy group I in my research on the subject; the GRAA. Gun Rights Across America.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    Yes, Citing the name of the case is important. A link to a credible synopsis of the decision would be even better.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    The onus to provide validity of the claim is not upon the reader.
    Instead of hammering out multiple paragraphs of rant, you might try linking some compelling evidence.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    The biggest variable being the human mind… Therefor I think is more important to address the problem of why our “society” is breeding people who are compelled to commit random murder.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    I agree but that only addresses one very small aspect of gun violence.

  • Brixtony

    He hasn’t looked it up on Wickipedia yet.

  • Minarchist Jerry

    I should have given the reference at the outset, yes. However, anyone who is interested in debating a contrary stance needs to do their homework before coming to the table. “I’m scared,” regardless of whatever research you might cook up, is not sufficient reason to take away a Constitutionally guaranteed right.

  • Willow Street Watch

    http://www.gun rights across America.com

    I suggest you start with the GRAA which is at this point the fastest growing and, well, really the current premier 2nd Amendment advocacy organization.

    I want to see if you can honestly refute, not dispute, but to make a valid refu5ation of a single point the GRAA has put forth.

    And the onus, sir, should be on the side which is seeking to take away American’s rights and privileges….

    Now, without rock throwing, which of my seven points can you refute?….Hmmm ….again, I thought so.

  • Concerned

    SB, as I’m sure you know, those who are for gun control are not “against the 2nd amendment” or the constitution. We are for common sense measures to regulate guns in America for the good of society. This is similar to other measures limiting rights enumerated in the constitution, like free speech and religion.
    Framing those who are for common sense gun control as “against the 2nd amendment” is a dangerous frame and one that the NRA tries to set, i.e. gun control is unconstitutional, un-American, etc…. freedom fries…screw the Dixie Chicks, etc…..
    Either way, I’m pretty sure this wasn’t your intention, but I wanted to point it out for you for future reference. It’s easy to fall into these frames, that’s why the CATO institute and Frank Luntz get paid the big bucks!!!

  • StudioBrooklyn

    You got me…just so you know that’s not my frame of mind but I was trying to give a very abbreviated description of the whole argument. Not “against” the second amendment, then, but maybe in favor of revising it. “The right to bear arms BUT…”

  • Willow Street Watch

    Of course!, we should be healing minds and lives. But how to do that in a free society? I have a neighbor who is a researcher at Columbia in a program which wants to put circuits on a mass basis in brains.
    (This is a very well funded program by the wa)

    If we want a safer more settled society the answer is NOT taking away rights, the answer is resocialization and the only way to do that is (gasp) reinstitution of traditional values in education. Every radical
    in education is doing nothing but constructing human bombs then injecting them into society. A reemergence of. Traditional valued religion in society is indispensable to resocialization. We need to make men be something called fathers and women be mothers who exercise care and good overview of their children to adulthood. They also were reactive to any social distortion starting anywhere in their vicinity. This alone produces a stable society offering safety to its members.

    Protection by physical means must exist, but that (should) be the very last line of defense in any civilized society.

  • Willow Street Watch

    No, again the onus of proving support of a position should certainly first be on the party advocating the reduction or elimination of some constitutional right or legal or social privilege for some “social objective. Let the rights grabbers have to show real need for their advocated actions.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    I’m not trying to refute any of your points. I was simply saying if you are going to make a point back it up.

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlsiLOnWCoI Arch Stanton

    I don’t see it as a small part, I think it is the root of the issue.

  • StudioBrooklyn

    Perhaps I should have been more clear: I suspect that “people who are compelled to commit random murder” (emphasis on “compelled” and “random”) are only a small part of the larger picture of gun violence. Of course the human mind is where the buck stops.

    I don’t think anyone who is in full possession of their human faculties deliberately kills another. “Moments of passion”, combat conditioning (the sorts of brainwashing techniques necessary to cultivate effective soldiers and gang members), and mental illness all speak to a breakdown of the naturally occurring human cognitive impulses that prevent us from murdering each other. And, to give that assertion more weight, when those impulses are temporarily suspended and the horrible act occurs, often the body reacts physically to the dissonance in the aftermath. (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leon_Festinger#Cognitive_dissonance)

  • Concerned

    Well, I wasn’t trying to “get” you, I was merely attempting to edify the blog on…….Ok, I was trying to get you. Got ya!!!!!

  • Willow Street Watch

    Notice what I’m getting now fro Mr Station and other critics, we ask for them to PROVE the need for American to give up more of their rights and see what you get?…..the sound of silence!

  • Brixtony

    Sorry for the multiple posts, but I wanted to make sure that everyone who needed to know this is in the loop. The “watcher” has now become the watched.

    Look what I found in the archives: http://brooklynheightsblog.com/archives/30169

  • Willow Street Watch

    No wonder the multiple posts. Once a rock thrower, always a rock thrower!

    Or is it? , let’s see, who was it who (it is alleged) said “the more you repeat a lie the more people believe it”?….. Hmmm- brix/studio/Archie et al, is that someone you really like??

  • Willow Street Watch

    The fact that this is a foreign British, crown funded organization reaching into American internal political process doesn’t even phase you at all, does it?

    What a great patriot….is that being loyal to this country?

  • displacer

    … legal age of ownership lowered from 18/21 to 16 in most states, 50-state concealed carry reciprocity, no prohibition from being used or carried in public, license and registration only required for use in public spaces just as it is now, carry license renewal requirements doubled from 5 years to 10 years in most states, prohibition of ownership for felons and those convicted of drug crimes removed since that’s how cars work, removal of mandatory background checks, easy and legal circumvention of of state restrictions like magazine capacity limits or feature bans on the basis that your gun in legal in your home state, and a bunch of other hilarious things that happen when you want to regulate guns exactly like cars?

    That’s not a bad deal, honestly.

    Also the idea of gun inspections sound hilarious, because there’s basically nothing that can go mechanically wrong with them. *bored single mom in city hall basement looks at gun, confirms item in question is still a gun, hands gun back to you. repeats 7,000 more times that day*