No More Landmarks Legislation, Insists Realtor Lobbying Coalition

A group formed by the powerful Real Estate Board of New York that includes a half-dozen development and labor organizations, is sharpening its knives to rally against future Landmarks legislation in New York City neighborhoods. The new alliance—the Responsible Landmarks Coalition—is gunning to bring a cease fire to what it calls “the increasing prevalence of historic districts, a lack of transparency in the landmarking process and insufficient public input.”

The New York Observer reports that the Coalition insists the growing number of landmark buildings and historic districts are hampering the city’s economy and stymieing development. Their fury was fueled, in particular, by the February approval of the Downtown Brooklyn Skyscraper District, which the realtor groups tried with great might to squash. Their argument then and now: Creating a far-reaching historic district elevates “unspectacular buildings beyond their worth.”

In addition, the Observer says the groups were inflamed by approval of a Landmarked district on West End Avenue on the Upper West Side.

The Responsible Landmarks Coalition has drafted a “Proactive Policy Agenda” that is part policy, part manifesto, and launched a website here, as well as Facebook and Twitter accounts to peddle their message to the public. The Facebook page boasts a total of eight “Likes.”

“We’re concerned that if you apply the concept of landmarks preservation too much, you resrtrict housing and impinge on other aspects of city life,” said Richard Anderson, president of the New York City Building Congress, a trade group for architects, engineers and contractors.

Peg Breen, president of the Landmarks Conservancy, counters that studies find that preservation increases or maintains property values. In addition, she questions the motives of the groups, given that only 4% of NYC is protected by Landmarks laws: “That leaves plenty of room for everybody else.”

In addition to the Building Congress and the Real Estate Board, the coalition includes the Manhattan Chamber of Commerce; three residential landlord groups—the Rent Stabilization Association, the Council of New York Cooperatives and Condominiums and the Community Housing Improvement Program—the Building Workers Union 32BJ and two groups representing construction unions, the Building Trades Employers Association and the Building and Construction Trades Council.

See The New York Observer article here.

Share this Story:

, , ,

  • stuart

    My goodness, there are four well-connected arrogant windbags in 75 Livingston Street that want to show the City and the regular folk who’s boss. A big Bronx Cheer for them.
    I wish they just move to Houston or Phoenix, where they would be much happier.

  • David on Middagh

    It’s a shame the members of the Responsible Landmarks Coalition hadn’t formed a “Coalition for Responsible Demolition” before Saint Francis College had built its new library upon the space once occupied by a not-unspectacular edifice.

  • Esther

    They are raping and ruining New York. Beautiful works of art are being torn down and replaced by ugly cheap boxes.

    No more culture, no more creativity.

  • Andrew Porter

    “Responsible Landmarks Coalition”, as opposed to, uh, perhaps the “Irresponsible Landmarks Coalition”. Same as “Right to Life” versus what? “Right to Death”?

    Let’s hear it for the landmarked interior of the Biltmore Hotel, destroyed in the middle of the night by its owner, a Responsible landlord. There are hundreds of examples, from Penn Station down, of the tear-it-down-before-they-landmark-it mentality.

    Then there’s the ACLJ, the right-wing American Center for Law and Justice, versus the ACLU. Coming in ahead of you in the alphabetical listings makes all the difference, I suppose.