Comments on: Yassky, Gioia Protest Dock Street DUMBO

By: The Where

The Where — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 13:14:48 +0000

This debate is simply foolish on both sides. All of you may just as well end your comments with “na na nanana”. You too Yassky.

By: davoyager

davoyager — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 07:33:42 +0000

While I think they are selling out if they vote against this worthy project.
Councilmembers, think twice before casting your ballot oppose to Dock Street

By: No One of Consequence

No One of Consequence — Mon, 01 Jun 2009 03:03:55 +0000

Your guy in the White House campaigned on it, now here’s your chance it end politics as usual.

As I’ve been saying, the only thing that matters with the pols is the perception, and right now they are easily perceived as selling out democracy for personal gain.

Councilmembers, think twice before casting your ballot in favor of Dock Street.

By: Publius

Publius — Sun, 31 May 2009 23:55:41 +0000

The Daily News today has an interesting article about how the real estate interests provide hundreds of thousands of dollars in “donations” to key City Councilpeople.

Melinda Katz, recipient of Two Trees bundled largess is profiled as one of the biggest recipients of development money. Of course the same could be said for Speaker Quinn.

And guess what? Developers who “donate” usually get their projects approved! Suprise!

This article couldn’t be more timely with all of the “donations” Two Trees has been bundling to key City Councilpeople.

Hopefully articles like this one plus the scrutiny that Councilmen Gioia and Yassky are placing on the subject will affect the City Council vote on Dock Street:

http://tinyurl.com/lb4egz

By: Bobs ur uncle

Bobs ur uncle — Sun, 31 May 2009 23:10:28 +0000

Jazz is the only one makes sense.

By: Jose Uribe

Jose Uribe — Sun, 31 May 2009 17:36:39 +0000

Is there anyway to ban idiots like Jazz from commenting? At least Carlo can write decent English and construct cogent arguments (even if he is on the wrong side of the issue). Jazz’s posts are like noise pollution or exhaust from a car tailpipe.

By: Jazz

Jazz — Sun, 31 May 2009 15:46:21 +0000

I’m saying there will be no school, and that the wiley Walentas will succeed in their Jedi mindtricks and get their huge luxury hotel. And that makes y’all suckahs. FOLLOW THE MONEY. If you’re protesting this because of the “historic vista” (hardy har har) being blocked, protesting because you want a middle school there (please stop, can’t stop laughing) you are eating RED HERRING. FOLLOW THE MONEY. This is a corrupt deal period. There are crooks on all sides. WAKE UP WHITE PEOPLE. Shut up about the view. Shut up about the school. START ASKING REAL QUESTIONS. Your view, your kids are UNIMPORTANT HERE.

Carlo – don’t even bother commenting.

By: Matthew Parker

Matthew Parker — Sun, 31 May 2009 15:42:04 +0000

If Dock St. Dumbo is passed and in “5 years or so you guys” don’t get your non-binding promised middle school, “I hope you remember this moment.

By: Jazz

Jazz — Sun, 31 May 2009 15:19:01 +0000

Sadly, you are right on the money. But then again what’s so wrong with that? Better than a school for hoolligans and rentals for the poor. Totally.

By: davoyager

davoyager — Sun, 31 May 2009 07:26:54 +0000

In 5 years or so you guys will get a Trump style hotel in your face. Should that happen, I hope you remember this moment.